Agentside designs, ships, and measures your MCP integration — curated tools agents use correctly, auth that survives the real world, and listings in the Claude and ChatGPT directories. Agent-ready in six weeks.
renew_proposalEvery one of these is a conversation we've had with a CTO in the last few months. The agent channel is new enough that nobody on your team has shipped it before — and old enough that your customers expect it anyway.
The board keeps asking what our AI strategy is.
A live listing in the Claude and ChatGPT directories is the visible, credible answer — your product working inside the tools your buyers already use.
Our engineers can build one with Claude Code in a week.
They can — and it'll ship confidently wrong. The code was never the hard part. Deciding what agents should never do, debugging the auth edge cases AI can't see, and getting through directory review is.
We generated one from our OpenAPI spec. Agents misuse it constantly.
A raw API mirror is bad agent UX. We design a small, curated tool surface around real jobs — the difference between a demo and a channel.
OAuth took three weeks and it still breaks.
OAuth 2.1, dynamic client registration, WAF rules silently eating agent traffic — we've debugged every one of these failure modes in production.
We shipped a connector. No idea if anyone uses it.
Every server we ship is instrumented from day one: who's connecting, which tools they use, where agents struggle, and what it's doing to retention.
A model update broke two tools. A customer found out first.
Models change under you. Our eval suites run your tool surface against new model versions before your customers do.
Most teams treat an MCP server as a checkbox. We treat it as a channel — which means it gets the same rigour as any other channel:
You should — as a starting point. Generators and coding agents produce a correct scaffold in a day. What they don't produce: the decision of which capabilities agents should never have, descriptions tuned for how models actually read them, auth that survives your specific infrastructure, and an approved directory listing. Teams that ship the scaffold get a connector that technically works and practically embarrasses them. We charge for the judgment layer, often using the same generators underneath.
Safer than most teams' first attempt, if it's designed deliberately. We scope tools to each user's existing permissions, fence off destructive operations behind explicit human approval, and never give agents capabilities your UI wouldn't give the same user. The audit includes a written do/never-do boundary for your product.
That's exactly what the audit is for — it's two weeks and $4k to find out, and you keep the roadmap either way. What we'd gently point out: your customers' behaviour decides this, not your roadmap, and they're adopting agent tools faster than most vendors expect.
Yes — that's the design goal. Everything ships in your repos, on your infrastructure if you prefer, with documentation written for your engineers. The ops retainer exists for teams who'd rather not own model-release regressions and directory changes, not because you're locked in.
A platform engineer who shipped a production MCP for a global SaaS company — through OAuth and dynamic client registration, WAF rules that silently blocked agent traffic, directory review, and into real customer use. The scar tissue is the product.
The Agent Readiness Audit is fixed-fee, fixed-scope, and ends with a working demo and a roadmap you keep. If the channel isn't worth it for you, the audit will say so.
Prefer to talk first? Book a 20-minute intro call.